跳过主要内容

Chancellor on Budget Reduction

当我们回顾经济衰退的最后几年时,我们可以看到巨大的预算挑战。在此期间,高等教育的预算和北卡罗来纳州的预算已逐步降低。削减很痛苦。我们失去了工作,班级和课程课程。经济援助较少,学费更高。

Yesterday, the Board of Governors approved state budget allocations that included more than 15 percent in reductions for NC State. That represents a loss of about $80 million from our appropriated budget. There is no doubt that there is considerable pain in this budget reduction.

But, as I said in my installation speech, we are not going to let budget challenges cripple us. We will move forward by thinking differently about the way we are organized and operate. If there is positive news in this budget environment, it’s this: the combined efforts of our organizational realignment, strategic planning and ongoing budget planning have positioned us to lessen the impact of the reduction.

We have given ourselves the ability to keep moving forward in a resource-constrained environment. And, we will do so without further tuition increases for the upcoming academic year.

我们将能够将学术方面的削减限制在约7%;在行政方面,对单位的减少通常在10%的范围内。不是一个完美的场景,但肯定比15%更好。

The tireless efforts of many people at NC State have contributed significantly to the campuswide strategic planning process and organizational realignment. With their input, we have the method and means to strategically focus our resources on our academic core, deliver on our research and economic development mission and support organizational excellence.

Also, over the last three years, we have taken budget planning steps to prepare ourselves for just such a budget as this one by, for example, making one-time expenditures rather than recurring investments. Those one-time dollars are then unencumbered in the next budget cycle. Units have also taken steps to hold vacant positions open, which helps to spare us some loss of filled positions.

即使我们在整个校园中所做的所有辛勤工作,对于NC State来说,这仍然是一个艰难的时期。尽管我们定位自己以抵消今年的15%减少的一些,但在过去几年中,重复的预算削减量削弱了我们维持进一步损失的能力。

我们将继续竭尽所能,以维护我们为学生提供的教育质量和这所大学的活力。我们将竭尽所能继续成为那种将使北卡罗来纳州恢复繁荣的经济发展的引擎。我们一直是纳税人美元的好管家。我们一直是北卡罗来纳州的好伙伴。我们是国家最佳价值,以质量,负担得起的教育承诺。在我们的财政支持不断侵蚀的同时,我们不可能继续成为所有这些事情。

I know this is a time of great anxiety for everyone, particularly our employees, who have not had a salary increase in three years and who have shouldered the load of lost jobs. I thank you for your dedication to NC State, the state of North Carolina and our students.

The work of creating this year’s university budget is almost over. We are working out the details with the deans and executive officers to provide clarity on unit allocations and should know more next week.

Like you, I am hopeful that the economy is on the way up and that we have weathered the worst of our budget reductions. As we put the budget conversation behind us, we can get on to the work of preparing ourselves for a new academic year with an extra measure of optimism and a renewed pride in NC State University.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

  1. 对于想要削减学者并仅支持“核心”计划的响应者:
    NCSU是一家土地赠款机构。这意味着其存在的主要原因是教育和支持NC的公民。除非我们想成为凤凰城或ITT技术研究所的大学,我们必须继续所有支持NC的计划。其中包括许多技术人员认为不必要的那些非技术计划。我鼓励所有阅读此书的人(包括总理,教务长和董事会,如果他们确实这样做)来检查NCSU的原始任务,并进行一些灵魂搜索,以了解我们对保持土地赠款的真正认真程度。就个人而言,我一直选择仅仅因为任务而为土地赠款工作。我还不够天真地认为我们可以不改变而生存,但是我们应该成为我们不应该和不应该成为的东西吗?如果是这样,我们很多人都处于错误的位置……从长远来看,没有人会赢。

  2. 不幸的是,我们可能需要在cutting entire disciplines. Deeper administrative cuts and shallower org charts will help, but we need to stop pulling money from our best programs to keep under-performing programs afloat. NCSU is trying to be too many things. When budgets improve we can reinvest in trying to diversify, but we need to determine our core and protect that for the time being.

    Additionally, I think we should evaluate consolidation of IT. Over the past couple years, OIT, a once bloated organization has had round after round of RIFs while we maintain a grossly disorganized and inefficient IT climate. We are no longer capable to even keep up with changing compliance rules that then threatens our ability to grow or even maintain our research funding streams.

  3. 手指和跨部门的纠纷无济于事。我们需要集结我们的总理及其决定。所有部门都在努力工作,所有员工都在努力工作。感谢上帝,我们在这里有好的领导者做出这些决定。

  4. 2010年8月17日,戈德沃特学院(AZ)(AZ)发表了一项关于1993-2007时期NCSU在内的198个公立和私立大学支出的研究。在此期间,北卡罗来纳州州立大学的全职管理员人数增加了61.4%,而4.6%的教学,研究和服务人员和学生入学人数增加了14.4%。NCSU的管理员的增加远高于所有198个机构的平均39.37%,而平均全职教学和研究职位平均平均仅为17.6%(相比之下,NC State仅为4.6%)。在此期间,平均入学率增加与NC状态下的平均招生率相同(14.5%)。

    The Chancellor proposes to cut the administrative budget by around 10%, while limiting academic cuts to about 7% It seems clear to me that the bloated administrative budget can be cut much more severely with little loss to the performance, or mission of the University. Less of the cuts should come from the academic side which has been underfunded for years. Our students are continually reuired to pay more and in return, receive less quality in return for their investment in education.

    Dr. Gerald H. Elkan
    微生物学名誉教授
    North Carolina State University

  5. We are like the band playing on the Titanic. We are playing really well, but it makes no difference in the long run. If we are going to survive (and there is no guarantee that we will) we must start thinking in terms of systems and processes. Eienstein said we cant fix problems with the same thinking that created them. We can’t omit any person/position without it having some impact, usually a lot larger than we initially think (unintended consequences). Apply the simple 80/20 rule to everything that we consider doing, e.g., 20% of either processes or people cause 80% of the ‘dead weight’. We could eliminate 80% of financial waste by analyzing 20% of the major processes like the 12 cell matrix (who made that idiotic thing up anyway?), administration and maintenance of external funds and the inefficient way our entire budgeting happens at the College level. NCSU is an excellent engineering and technical university, so where are all the process/ reengineering experts already? Dr Woodward attempted to start a such an effort. We have to be smart enough to figure this out, don’t we?

  6. NCSU needs to be looking hard at the Graduate School, and the excessive waste that goes on there. For example, the entire professional development unit is a drain on University resources. It’s nice to have those services when you have the money to throw into supporting them, but not important enough to make the cut when you’re cutting to the bone.
    Admissions could be turned completely over to the departments, student appointments could be handled in HR, student records management could go to the Registrar’s Office.. Hmmm.. what exactly does the Graduate School do as an administrative unit that offers anything of value to NCSU?

  7. It is time to be a year-round university. We need 3 terms a year so we can improve graduation rates and make effective use of our educational facilities that languish during low-enrolled 5-week summer terms. We have 12-month staff but 9-month faculty. For 3 months in the summer, staff are fully funded to support faculty and students who are not here. If you want efficiency, fix the schedule since time is money. There is nothing efficient about summer school. With infrastructure, administration and staff already in place, adding faculty to fully fund
    a 3-month summer term is a relatively small addition. Students can move through their undergraduate and graduate programs at 3 terms a year rather than 2. Or if they choose, they can remain on a 2-term/year schedule and take off a trimester for co-ops, internships, study abroad, research, work, etc. Georgia Tech offers nearly all of its classes during the summer. A faculty governance task force has proposed a new academic calendar with 3 14-week terms with a pilot forthcoming. My preference is three 13-week terms so there is time between terms to organize, prepare, run workshops, upgrade facilities, etc. You can move more students through our programs more quickly without any loss of educational quality.

  8. How can the chancellor support current University wide renovations (e.g. The Tally Center, Book Store, Chancellor’s Villa, Centennial Library) in such a hard economic climate. Should these projects not have been shelved until the economy recovers, retaining academic and staff jobs?

    What is the justification for this?

    1. 西蒙:学生费用,租金收入和礼物正在为塔利学生中心/书店翻新和私人捐款提供资金,为总理的住所支付了费用。大会几年前批准了百年纪念校园的亨特图书馆的资金,在2009年预算危机期间,该项目的国家分配减少了。以下是一些链接,其中包含您提到的项目的详细预算信息以及NC国家预算常见问题解答。

      塔利学生中心翻新:
      http://web.ncsu.edu/campusenterprises/talley/BuildingFAQ.html
      Chancellor’s Residence:

      http://web.ncsu.edu/this-red-house/building-overview/
      亨特图书馆:
      http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/huntlibrary/faq.html#q8
      NC State Budget FAQ:
      http://www.ncsu.edu/budget/faq/

  9. Chancellor Woodson:
    I wanted to thank you and your staff for the work with the budget. I realize that this is a difficult problem, and I wanted to congratulate you on your progress with a minimum amount of disturbance to the NC State community.
    I don’t believe the national economic problems have been solved—indeed, I don’t think there has been a serious attempt to do that—and I fear further cuts will be necessary.
    Please, it is easy to cut administrative expenses, and that may be required, but academics need to be seriously considered.
    Thanks for listening.

  10. “We are working out the details with the deans and executive officers”

    Well I would start by cutting the administration by at least 30% and see how much of a change it would make. I would argue that most of the Executive and Assistant and Associate and Vice positions are totally unnecessary on this campus. What do they do other than make meetings and plan things that never get implemented and waste time and money? You could go a long way to making this place run a lot more efficiently if you went to each college and each department and stating that so and so is in charge and if people do not like it then they can leave. The current Dean’s and really good admin secretaries can run almost everything in a college and the rest can be managed in departments. No need for Assistant and Associate Deans. No need for Vice Chancellors and Vice Provosts. Those are all bogus titles anyway. How do they help students on a day to day basis? Cutting research dollars to pay these people is a joke.

    A small for instance for you: the Communications department on campus does NOT need a Chief Communications Officer. There is already a Director so why does that person need a boss? YOU ARE THE BOSS, you can make that place do would is needed by backing the current Director. There is no need to waste $240,000 on another useless administrator.

    我希望能够为自己的工作而感到自豪,并努力工作,以确保学生,员工和教师拥有我们可以负担得起的最好的网络(在这些时期并不容易,但可行)。请花点时间意识到您正在通过削减研究人员的钱来看待错误的事情,而牺牲了那些几乎没有给学生的人。

    祝您有美好的一天。